by Johnmer Poblador Villanueva
I am always surprised why things are very timely for me these days. Well, we are tasked to make a phenomenological paper on our uneasy experience which I consider as my hardest experience and insofar as I am concerned, I am undergoing the experience since last week. I am in my hardest experience… that is, I am being silenced. Oh well, this is quite interesting – to share the experience in a phenomenological way since I am not good in this philosophy. This paper, by the way, would be something difficult for me to do but since I have a much larger difficulty, then, I will do my best to share it this way, the hard way.
Allow me to explain the context first. Let me put it this way… it is a separation from what has been a routine or lifestyle of talking and performing always on stage, with or without a platform. Separation is detachment from someone or something very important, or at least connected or related to a person or thing. It is taking away from the whole or from where it has been connected. Traveling down the not so far memory lane- last year I have been very direct to almost every spotlight in stage performances, emceeing and even in floral arrangements. To be honest about it, these things or acts define and describe me. Middle of last month, the rector informed me to lessen my activities. My SD even said, “we already know your capacity… let the other, the younger stars shine too.” That is it… when all others are pushed to their limits of coming out of their shells, I am being pushed to come in a bit. This makes my being silenced the hardest experience so far. I am not who I am if you take some essential or even integral parts of myself. Let me begin my phenomenological sharing with a bit of sarcasm about myself … I think I am not who am when silenced.
I am being silenced. The “I” stands as subject of the sentence which refers to the speaker of the statement. It is the “I” which is being silenced. The entire sentence is in present progressive tense which technically means that the “I” is currently and continuously experiencing the act of being “silenced.” Reading between the lines, one might easily conclude that a force-which could be a person or thing, is silencing the “I.” One could not determine easily though, if the force arises from an internal or external environment. If the “I” is intersubjective, one might say that more or less it is the “I’s” surrounding world that forces it to be silenced. “Being” on the other hand refers to the way how the “I” is silenced. It could be true that the “I” as subject had been loud, in whatever degree of loudness it may be, thus the word “being” is the “how” that determines the degree of being silenced. It is as if the force, which we already understood as discreetly seen in the statement, is controlling the “being” there, or rather, the “being” is the force therein. Well, beyond these phenomenological arguments, I am compelled to believe that it is indeed my most uneasy or my hardest experience. There is indeed a force telling the “I” to be silenced. “Silenced” alone is in past tense, but since it is preceded by “am being” it refers to the present and what is on-going. If there is something which is “being silenced,” then it is rational to think that there has been a noise or a sound that was created in the past or, there is a continuing noise or sound.
Will the “I” change its identity or worth when silenced? I think there is no evident answer to this query but talking from a logical perspective, I would say that there is a change of identity or worth of the “I.” However, in reduction, “I” is the only one left and everything is in the “I.” Going into spiritual reflections, I as speaker believe that the “I” in the statement is somehow changed by the intensity or degree of its loudness but it does not take away the identity or worth of the “I.” There are many other factors that constitute the “I” aside from the noise or sound it creates. Thus, it is safe to believe that the “I” retains its being “I” despite of “being silenced.” But why has this become an uneasy and the hardest experience of the “I” so far? The uneasiness or hardness of the situation is derived from the act of “being silenced.” This act is different from what has been or routinely done in the past or even in the present. The force, “being”, allows the mutability of the nature of the “I” become possible. The “I” could either allow the “being” to “silenced” itself or not. But, it has become my- I am the “I”, uneasy or the hardest experience because this is not usual of the past and of the present to be “silenced.”
Undeniably, I am not good in phenomenology but I thank this opportunity to do these personal clarifications so as not to purge myself unwillingly into a new reality of being silenced. Sarcastically, I said, I am not who am if silenced, but I wish to say it this time that I hope to see myself better than what I have been used to. Thus, the uneasy or hardest experience of “being silenced” is expected to help better the “I.”