Filipino Philosophy is essentially about Filipino values, behaviors, or culture. There is actually no such thing as ‘formalized’ Filipino philosophy. What we have today as Filipino Philosophy is a philosophizing of the values, behaviors, or culture that we have. We are, in principle just extracting philosophical principles from what we have and then take them as Filipino philosophy. So when speaking about Filipino philosophy one has to go to the values and the like.
The Filipino ‘We’ – this is how I would call it. I would like to focus here on the social behavior of Filipinos – Companionship or Pakikisama: “The Filipino Social Philosophy.” For the Westerners, they would emphasize and highlight the ‘I.’ This is reflected in their culture; individualistic, independent, and focusing on themselves. On the other hand, this is not the case for Filipinos; it’s not the ‘I,’ but the ‘We.’ The community or the larger aspect of the society is the focus. Filipinos are not happy when alone or by themselves (in contrast to the Westerners). Filipinos find happiness and security in being with their group or companions. The Filipino is ‘Person-oriented.’ He thinks of himself as belonging to, and identifies himself with a group, and considers the success and welfare of the group as his own. The Filipino is less individualistic because he wants to be in harmony with his fellowmen.
This may seem so positive, but looking at the other side of the coin this is actually the root of one of the many problems we have – overfamiliarity and abuse. Due to the Filipino social behavior of Companionship or Pakikisama, the mindset of the Filipinos becomes too ‘person-oriented’ to the point that a Filipino would do anything, yes anything (even the bad ones) just for the sake of maintaining harmony with his fellowmen, friends, and especially relatives and family members. People would often say “sige ah, total paryente ko man ikaw; sige una ka lang, indi ka na lang mag-linya kay hinablos ko man ikaw; ako bahala simo ah, ako manager didto…” With this overfamiliarity, a lot would take advantage and use this in order to make things easier or more comfortable for them. A Filipino could easily set aside rules, moral values, or the good just to accommodate the people close to them.
This is something that we must avoid and take away. Why? Basically speaking, this makes us Filipinos unfair in relating to people. Just because they are our friend, relative, family member, doesn’t follow that they are exempted from making lines, going through interviews, or going through the hard way. Whether someone is close to you or not doesn’t change the rules. It doesn’t change a thing. Yes, it is true that we have to prioritize the people close to us, but when it comes to the public realm like for example our work, this is not the case anymore. In public office, we have to be fair and objective. Family affairs don’t matter in this case.
Now no matter how negative this may be, this is something that makes us a Filipino. Filipinos are known for and are used to this behavior. However, in principle, this is something that we can take away but still remain a Filipino. I’m not saying that we take away the value of “pakikisama” or companionship. What we have to take away is this overfamiliarity that grows or results from this companionship that we Filipinos have.
Strictly speaking, yes we have this companionship, but then we should make it to a point that it doesn’t go over and result overfamiliarity or abuse. If this is the case, we have just become not a Filipino, but still remain a Filipino. ‘Not a Filipino’ in the sense that we have taken away this overfamiliarity. ‘But still remain a Filipino’ in the sense that we still have the value of companionship with in us. So the essential behavior here is companionship while this overfamiliarity, although seemingly Filipino, is just a result or an extreme of this companionship. So, in principle, we could take it away and still remain a Filipino since what is essential is companionship. Not F (Filipino; overfamiliarity), but still F (Filipino; companionship).
– Raymond Brotarlo Pasco